Message |
|
Re: Re '59 low 9 Double Punched G in Regina
Yes, that makes sense, too! I was not considering the marriages, as the basis of the wear on either face. It was an idea that I had, and it needed testing. it failed! Just trying to learn a little bit, while I am still around. ( Not that I plan on going right away, but I don't write the script).
Have you a theory as to the "why" the coins are concave, or convex, depending on how one looks at it? Anyone? TIA.
Dick, 6/7/2011
CCRS member since: 7/15/2010
Posts: 1421
To post a reply to the above message, please sign in, or, if you are not a registered user of the Discussion, register first.
Re '59 low 9 Double Punched G in Regina (Dick, 6/6/2011) [this post has been deleted by its author] (6/7/2011) [this post has been deleted by its author] (6/7/2011) [this post has been deleted by its author] (6/7/2011) [this post has been deleted by its author] (6/7/2011) Re: Re '59 low 9 Double Punched G in Regina (Dick, 6/7/2011) [this post has been deleted by its author] (6/7/2011) Re: Re '59 low 9 Double Punched G in Regina (Dick, 6/7/2011) Re: Re '59 low 9 Double Punched G in Regina (JHax, 6/7/2011) Re: Re '59 low 9 Double Punched G in Regina (Dick, 6/8/2011)
Copyright ©
1997-2018 Torex® Coin Show & Auctions.
| Home
| Coin Clubs | Coin Shows | Dictionary |
Links | Resources |
| Gallery |
| Discussion | Marketplace | Video | Dealers |
Search | FAQ
|
| User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer |