Discussion


Click Here - for Canadian Coin News!





Message

 

Back   Next

Re: Shall we continue?

what makes it confusing, (to me, at least), id the use of P-L, and "Uncirculated" sets. The uncirculated sets are just like our "mint sets. The P-L sets from the ones I have received, all cut apart, are the same thing. even the card inside says "uncircolated sets, in that case,. I have not seen an intact P-L set, so can't argue that point. Then the come out with the "Specimen sets will be considered as proof sets. It gets very confusing, to say the least. i havwe a post, regarding this very subject, and am waiting for some kind of explanation, that can be accepted, and used as a norm. al

Dick, 9/8/2011
CCRS member since: 7/15/2010
Posts: 1421


Report Post


Back   Next

Reply to this message

To post a reply to the above message, please sign in, or, if you are not a registered user of the Discussion, register first.

Back to discussions


Postings in this thread

1959 (cbu, 9/4/2011)
 Re: 1959 (Rick Simpson, 9/4/2011)
  Re: 1959 (cbu, 9/4/2011)
   Shall we continue? (cbu, 9/8/2011)
    Re: Shall we continue? (Dick, 9/8/2011)
     Re: Shall we continue? (cbu, 9/10/2011)
      Re: Shall we continue? (Dick, 9/10/2011)

Back to discussions

top of the page


Copyright © 1997-2017  Torex® Coin Show & Auctions.

| Home | Coin Clubs | Coin Shows | Dictionary | Links | Resources |
| Gallery | | Discussion |
Marketplace | Video | Dealers | SearchFAQ |

| User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer |